Germany’s biggest news publisher, Axel Springer, recently conducted an experiment where they prevented Google from using excerpts of its content within Google News listings. They found this tanked their traffic, with organic traffic from Google dropping 40%, and Google News traffic dropping 80%. Sites like Buzzfeed are an exception, not the norm. Digiday reports that Google still sends 35% of a publisher’s total referral traffic, while Google News makes up 10% to 25% of a publisher’s total traffic.
So why are so many publishers optimizing for sharability rather than optimizing for search? One idea is that they’re not so much writing for shares, but writing for contemporary SEO practices. Google encourages publishers to write in human-friendly language, which also goes hand in hand with writing the type of content people would want to share with others. If you write strictly for search, you’re no longer writing for people.
Even though publishers aren’t actively optimizing for search, much of their content still ends up in Google News or Google organic search. The traffic they are receiving from it versus social media referrals is impossible to ignore. Do these findings coincide with what you have been noticing on your own site? Have you been receiving more traffic from social media lately, or from Google search and Google News? [Searh Engine Journal]